{"id":816,"date":"2020-03-10T16:00:09","date_gmt":"2020-03-10T20:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/anthropology\/?page_id=816"},"modified":"2021-03-03T20:16:04","modified_gmt":"2021-03-04T01:16:04","slug":"part-4","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/anthropology\/research\/slavery-in-nj\/part-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Part 4 – African Americans in the Cockpit of the Revolution"},"content":{"rendered":"
New Jersey is recognized historically as the site of significant battles and related military and political activities during the war of the American Revolution. People of color were closely tied to these machinations and fought on both sides of the war and found ways to advance their own freedom struggle. Hodges (1999:140) notes that \u201cBlacks in New York and New Jersey \u2026 viewed the Revolution as a triangular conflict\u201d between Patriots, Tories, and people of color.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The Somerset Decision<\/strong><\/p>\n Revolutionary conflicts between slaves and masters started in 1772 with the Somerset Decision, in which Chief Justice Lord Mansfield ruled that slavery would no longer be tolerated in Britain (Hodges 1997:94). Word of this decision inspired many to fear or hope that the ruling would be applied in the American colonies. Fishman (1997:103) reports that there was black uprising in Perth Amboy in 1772 that was perhaps a response to the decision. Hodges (1997:94) notes that in 1774 ninety-two slaveholders in Shrewsbury and Middleton in Monmouth County signed a petition to the Governor which \u201cdescribes blacks in the county as \u2018Increasing in Number and Impudence\u2019\u2026 and \u2018running about at all times of the Night Stealing and Taking and Riding Peoples Horses.\u2019\u201d Such night meetings continued into 1775 prompting fears that the \u201cDomestics\u201d would rise up and \u201ccut the throats of their Masters.\u201d The Committee of Safety in Shrewsbury ordered that all meetings of Negroes be broken up and that their guns and ammunition be confiscated. In February 1776 the committee ordered that \u201call slaves either negroes mollatos or others that shall be found off their masters\u2019 premises any time of the night after the daylight is done shall be Taken up [and] delivered to the Minute Men to be kept under Guard until he shall receive fifteen stripes on the Bare Back\u201d (in Hodges 1997:94-95). Clearly, in these years, enslaved persons were actively finding ways to meet and develop concerted action all the while terrifying white masters in ways that they likely enjoyed as a sort of freedom.<\/span><\/p>\n British offer freedom to escaped slaves<\/strong><\/p>\n There was a second decision that inspired African Americans to actively seek freedom and further disrupted the normal state of affairs. In November 1775, Lord Dunmore, the British Governor of Virginia, offered freedom to \u201cindent[ur]ed servants, negroes \u2026 willing to serve His Majesty\u2019s forces to end the present rebellion\u201d (in Hodges 2019:34). Those who responded this call became known as Dunmore\u2019s Ethiopian Regiment. Similar promises of freedom were made and advertised in newspapers by General William Howe and Henry Clinton in 1776 and 1779. Inspired by these declarations \u201chundreds of enslaved New Jerseyans fled their Patriot and Loyalist masters during the war to join the British forces in New York\u201d (Hodges 2019:35). Critical of Clinton\u2019s offer, one New Jersey poet wrote:<\/span><\/p>\n A proclamation of late he send<\/span><\/p>\n To thieves and rogues who are his only friends<\/span><\/p>\n Those he invites; all colors he attacks<\/span><\/p>\n But deference pays to <\/span>Ethiopian Blacks<\/span><\/i> (in Hodges 1999:150).<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Regardless, white apprehensions about offering freedom to captive Africans who ran away is clear. Not only did slaveholders not want to lose their property, but the gathering of slaves with plans for escape or revolt led to acts of repression. In Elizabeth in 1779, fears that \u201cnegroes had it in contemplation to rise and murder the inhabitants. Many of them are secured in goal\u201d (in Fishman 1997:105).<\/span><\/p>\n These fears were not without merit since the evidence for self-emancipation and retaliation is abundant. Fishman (1997:107) and Hodges (1999:144-45) both mentioned that after General Howe\u2019s Hessian troops entered New Barbados in 1776 that \u201cblacks fled their masters to work within the British lines.\u201d Fishman (1997:106) notes that newspaper advertisements between 1775 and 1782 record \u201c106 slave and 139 indentured New Jersey-related runaways.\u201d Some of these men and women escaped as the British passed through northern New Jersey in the later part of 1776, during which \u201cover fifty slaves\u201d from Bergen, Essex, Somerset, and Middlesex counties fled to the British to gain their freedom\u00a0 contributing to what was taken to be a \u201cwave of revolt\u201d (Hodges 1997:95). Self-emancipations continued throughout the war. Some of those known by name include Samuel Smith, James and Catherine Van Sayl, Aaron and Sarah Jones, and Oliver Vinson (Hodges 1999:95-96).<\/span><\/p>\n Some of these men and women appear to have contributed to several retaliatory acts. Following the Patriot retreat in November 1776, \u201cTorries and fugitive blacks sacked the homes of Patriots in Schraalenburgh in Bergen County \u2026 [and] raided the Bergen county Townships of Closter, Tenafly, and Tappan to secure cattle and forage.\u201d Also, in 1776, a former slave fighting with British in Newark murdered Thomas Hayes, slashed his uncle, and stabbed Nathan Baldwin (Hodges 1999:145).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n There was push back against these acts of self-emancipation. Patriots submitted ads to sell 113 slaves between 1776 and 1782, some of whom were Loyalist property (Hodges 2019:41). In some cases, the sales were of men and women caught away from their homes and thus assumed to be on the run. To curb these abuses, the New Jersey legislature \u201ctook action against these self-appointed enslavers in Continental uniforms\u201d by imposing a fine \u00a35000 on the kidnappers and setting the slave free (Fishman 1997:104). Patriots are known to have entered Tory property to confiscate goods and slaves. In Monmouth County Tories claimed the loss of twenty-nine slaves during the war.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The British also engaged in slave kidnappings. Fishman (1997:108) reports that \u201cthe British kidnapped a sizable group of Black people and impressed them into labor or military service.\u201d One estimate states that 250 slaves in total were taken. Examples include slaves taken along with livestock and a wagon in Monmouth County and slaves taken in a door-to-door search in Paterson.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Quaker abolitionists<\/strong><\/p>\n Not all whites were as abusive towards African Americans. In the spirit of the Revolution\u2019s focus on liberty, many New Jerseyans adopted an anti-slavery stance. One of the earliest voices to this effect were the Quakers who made up a sizable portion of the population in West Jersey, though many lived in the East Jersey as well. The Quaker anti-slavery stance was voiced in the Quaker Minute decision of 1755 which asked church members \u201cAre Friends clear of importing and buying Negroes and do they use those well which they are possessed of by Inheritance or otherwise endeavoring to train them up in the Principles of the Christian Religion?\u201d From this year forward Quakers debated and urged members to free their slaves, disowning those who did not.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The Quaker Samuel Allinson took to the legislature and the Governor to urge that New Jersey abolish slavery, though he met sharp resistance form slaveholders. They argued that free blacks were depraved and thus would be more of a problem than those who were enslaved. A draft bill which would have eliminated the surety fee of manumission was proposed, but it also forbade \u201cfree blacks from entertaining enslaved people and threatened heavy fines. Any free black could be sold into indentured slavery for nonpayment of debts, interracial marriages were punishable by fines of one hundred British pounds, any black [slave or free] who assaulted a white person would be whipped. Free black, mulattos, and Indians were prohibited from voting, holding office, or testifying against whites\u201d (Hodges 2019:36). This bill was never brought to a vote due the interference of the war, yet the racist and proslavery bent of its intent is clear.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Some non-Quakers were also advocates for abolition, including Jacob Green, a Presbyterian minister in Morris County. In 1776, Green laid bare the basic contradiction he saw in the Patriot cause:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n What a dreadful absurdity! What a shocking consideration, that people who are strenuously contending for liberty should at the same time encourage and practice slavery! And being thus guilty, expose themselves to the judgement of Heaven! May slavery cease in America! Well may the West India islands be afraid of their slaves where that unnatural inequity is so abundantly practiced (in Fishman 1997:114).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Repeating similar sentiments from the pulpit two years later, he was met with Patriot retaliation in the form of a mob who gathered to intimate him and then after he spoke ransacked his church.<\/span><\/p>\n Black loyalist retaliation<\/strong><\/p>\n Still, the strongest and most vital forces fighting against slavery were African Americans themselves. I have already mentioned that many took the opportunity to escape their bondage during the war and that others engaged in retribution, but the most potent Black action was taken by those who served both sides as soldiers and laborers. Stories of Black Loyalists in New Jersey are in fact some of the most interesting and important.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n One loyalist story begins in 1775 when the Quaker congregation in Shrewsbury, Monmouth County asked one of their members to free his slaves. This was John Corlies, who owned four slaves (his mother owned two others). Corlies stated that his slaves \u201chave no learning and he is not inclined to given them any\u201d and thus he felt no need to set them free. The congregation disowned Corlies in 1778. Among those present at these discussions was a slave named Titus, who was just about to become 21 years old, the age when Quakers would have set young men free. Hearing that he would not be freed, Titus chose to self-emancipate, which we know because Corlies put an ad in the <\/span>Pennsylvania Gazette<\/span><\/i> offering a reward for his return.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n